Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Miles Davis’

During the Arkansas Literary Festival, Isabel Wilkerson described her efforts to give high school students a sense of the oppressive, invasive restrictions enforcing the racial stratifications that drove many black Americans to seek freer, less confined lives by leaving the South and heading north and west in the Great Migration, the subject of her book The Warmth of Other Suns. Everyone has already heard about separate white and “colored” drinking fountains and whites-only restaurants, she said. For those too young to grasp the full extent of the racist caste system of the past, she sought examples to which those just learning to drive could relate. Some states forbade black motorists from passing white ones, regardless of how slow they might be moving. She sees youngsters’ bafflement over such ridiculous rules as a sign of progress.

Wilkerson provided other illustrations to drive home just how unrelenting – and absurd – Jim Crow legislation was. Speaking at the Mosaic Templars Cultural Center in Little Rock, she cited a law that required court rooms to have separate bibles for black and white witnesses to place their hands on when swearing to tell the truth; she described a trial’s delay when one of those books could not be found.

To give her audience a sense of how different the world would be if the Great Migration had not occurred, Wilkerson asked listeners to imagine the state of music, and culture generally, if Miles Davis, John Coltrane and Thelonious Monk had either never existed or never been able to become the great musicians they did. If those artists’ parents had not moved north, we might never have heard their music, she observed. It probably never would have been made. I’m not sure if this particular thought experiment would resonate with 21st-century teenagers, most of whom probably don’t listen to jazz, but it sure struck a chord in me.

Read Full Post »

Boxing history affords many fascinating ways to consider twentieth-century American history, including the evolution of attitudes about race, numerous boxers’ indirect and direct challenges to racist structures, and, of course, many remarkable achievements against the odds.

In acknowledgement of Black History Month, here are several recommendations of books about boxers and much, much more.

Jack Johnson, the first black heavyweight champion and a defiant disregarder of racial stereotypes, is the subject of at least two exceptional biographies, Papa Jack by Randy Roberts and Unforgivable Blackness by Geoffrey C. Ward. (I relied on both of these, among other sources, when readying my presentation at the 100th anniversary commemoration of Johnson’s 1910 fight with Jim Jeffries, which appears in the fall 2010 edition of The Nevada Review.) By the way, this month would be a great time to renew the call for a posthumous pardon for Johnson, who suffered a patently unjust 1913 conviction for violating the so-called White Slave Traffic Act (a.k.a. the Mann Act). Senator John McCain unsuccessfully pushed multiple times for such a pardon, which should be granted before the centennial of this miscarriage of justice arrives.

Thirty years after his death, it’s hard to imagine a boxer having the social impact that Joe Louis did. During his climb up the heavyweight ranks and his long, record-breaking (and still record-holding) reign as champion (1937-1949), he inspired pride in millions of people. His defeat of Max Schmeling, a boxer popularly associated with the Nazis, soon before World War II (in which Louis served as a soldier) became an event of profound national and international importance. David Margolick offers an exhaustive account of Louis’s two fights with Schmeling in Beyond Glory. Chris Mead and Roberts, among others, penned solid biographies of Louis. (I write at length about these and other books about Louis in an essay disseminated by Americana: The Institute for the Study of American Popular Culture.)

Sugar Ray Robinson, who like Louis grew up in Detroit, garnered much admiration for his style both in and out of the ring during the 1940s and 1950s, when he won titles as both a welterweight and a middleweight. In Sweet Thunder, Wil Haygood looks at Robinson’s life, along with the lives of peers such as trumpeter Miles Davis, poet Langston Hughes and singer Lena Horne. Looking back on the 1940s, Davis notes in his autobiography that “Joe Louis had been heavyweight champion of the world for a long time by then, and he was every black person’s hero – and a lot of white people’s, too. Sugar Ray Robinson wasn’t far behind him in popularity.” The jazz giant takes these boxers’ eminence as indication that “things were beginning to happen for black people in this country.”

Though usually regarded as an anti-hero rather than a hero, Charles “Sonny” Liston, the mob-backed devastating puncher who preceded then-Cassius Clay on the heavyweight throne, has a story worth telling, and Nick Tosches tells it in colorful fashion in The Devil and Sonny Liston. (Looks like this one is out of print, but it’s worth seeking out.)

I’ve heard it said that more has been written about Abraham Lincoln than any other president, and I would not be surprised if Muhammad Ali generated more ink than any other boxer. This makes it difficult to name just a few worthy books, but The Muhammad Ali Reader, edited by Gerald Early, gives a good sampling of numerous authors’ take on the man and his significance, and Thomas Hauser’s Muhammad Ali: His Life and Times remains the unbeaten biography.

Of course, many more boxers and many more books deserve attention, this month and year round. In the list of sources in the back of Fighters & Writers, I name more essential works of literature and history.

Read Full Post »

In order to write about them for The Oregonian, The American Interest and other publications, I read a fair number of brand new books in 2010. Nevertheless, I can’t make an honest top-ten list. Here are six that truly stood as exceptional:

  1. Martin Amis’s The Pregnant Widow (Alfred A. Knopf)
  2. Kevin Canty’s Everything (Nan A. Talese/Doubleday)
  3. Don DeLillo’s Point Omega (Scribner)
  4. Charles Goodrich’s Going to Seed: Dispatches from the Garden (Silverfish Review Press)
  5. Randy Robert’s Joe Louis: Hard Times Man (Yale University Press)
  6. Richard Williams’s The Blue Moment: Miles Davis’s Kind of Blue and the Remaking of Modern Music (W.W. Norton & Company)

The short list reflects my tendency to read roughly proportional amounts of fiction and nonfiction. I probably read more poetry in 2010 than in most years, and Goodrich’s small volume was my favorite of several contenders.

The year 2010 saw new books by authors I once thought of as reliably remarkable – Christopher Hitchens, Ian McEwan, Milan Kundera – that I found disappointingly inferior to their earlier efforts. I could name several very good but not quite excellent books. Here’s one: George Kimball and John Schulian assembled a fine collection of boxing-related poems in The Fighter Still Remains. A few years earlier, however, Robert Hedin and Michael Waters edited Perfect in Their Art, an anthology containing much of the same material – and a great deal more.

This leads to the Achilles heel of year-end lists: the absence of the great older stuff. While I read many books published during 2010, I also read many from other years, which are automatically disqualified from “best of” contention but deserve mention all the same. I reread some classics, like Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon and Norman Mailer’s The Naked and the Dead. (I also read several books about Mailer, but these weren’t so good.) I also finally got around to some wonderful books I should have read much sooner, such as Carson McCullers’s The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island. If I were to list the ten books I most enjoyed during 2010 regardless of publication date, the four named in this paragraph could be added to the six above.

Read Full Post »

“Few things have given me more pleasure in life than listening to jazz,” poet Philip Larkin claimed, but someone sampling his spirited writing on the subject might conclude that the music caused him great suffering. Here, for instance, is what he wrote about one of my favorite musicians:

With John Coltrane metallic and passionless nullity gave way to exercises in gigantic absurdity, great boring excursions and not-especially-attractive themes during which all possible changes were rung, extended investigations of oriental tedium, long-winded and portentous demonstrations of religiosity. It was with Coltrane, too, that jazz started to be ugly on purpose: his nasty tone would become more and more exacerbated until he was fairly screeching at you like a pair of demoniacally-possessed bagpipes.

And here’s what he said about another artist whose work I very much enjoy:

 I freely confess that there have been times recently when almost anything – the shape of a patch on the ceiling, a recipe for rhubarb jam read upside down in the paper – has seemed more interesting than the passionless creep of a Miles Davis trumpet solo.

Larkin was sincere when he said he loved jazz, however. He simply enjoyed the work of an earlier generation. He celebrated Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington and Ben Webster, among others. The vociferousness of his criticism of players he thought damaged a wonderful type of music is the flipside of this passion and, thus, understandable even to someone who doesn’t share his opinions. (And he clearly took some pleasure in the expression of pain.)

Hull, where Larkin spent three decades as a university librarian, planned 25 weeks’ worth of Larkin lauding to commemorate the 25th anniversary of his death, and its appropriate that events include performances of his beloved music hosted by Richard Palmer, the co-editor of one of Larkin’s books of writing on jazz and the author of Such Deliberate Disguises: The Art of Philip Larkin (about which I’ve had something to say). I’m guessing that nothing from A Love Supreme or Bitches Brew will be part of the program.

Read Full Post »

Boxing is a boon to scribblers. It provides useful metaphors for all sorts of struggles, whether they end in victory or defeat. It supplies resonant historical reference points and context. It offers ways to write about (usually male) human bodies. During the first part of 2010, as I selected photographs, reviewed proofs and performed other tasks related to the publication of Fighters & Writers, I read several books not ostensibly about boxing in which the sport is mentioned or discussed. These coincidences reconfirmed my premise: fighting and writing are closely connected.

Early in the year, I read Homer & Langley, in which E.L. Doctorow makes use of the sport’s vocabulary of defeat. He describes Langley Collyer, an extreme collector of newspaper and much else, reassembling a Model T automobile inside the house he shares with his blind brother, Homer, and trying to use its engine as an electricity generator. The fumes drive Homer and the siblings’ cook, Mrs. Robileaux (a.k.a. Grandmamma), outdoors. Homer recalls: “We sat across the street on a bench at the park wall and Grandmamma announced, as if describing a boxing match, the struggle between Langley and the prevailing darkness, the lights in our windows flickering, sputtering, flaring, and then finally going down for the count.”  

A couple of months later, I read Solar, in which Ian McEwan uses the sport’s recognized gesture of victory. His Nobel Prize-winning physicist Michael Beard, after a ceremonial speech about an alternative energy project, acknowledges the role of his partner by raising his arm “boxing-ring style.” McEwan also makes one of Beard’s colleagues and rivals a former boxer, and the young solar-energy enthusiast’s physical fitness contrasts markedly with Beard’s “dysmorphia.”

Other writers invoke particular boxers to lend an air of authenticity or symbolic poignancy to their fiction. In Grand River and Joy, a novel set in the lead up to and aftermath of the 1967 Detroit riot (and named for an intersection of two streets in the city), Susan Messer has a teenage character who sees the military draft as a conspiracy to rid the United States of black youth. When a friend asks him if he’ll go fight in Vietnam, he replies: “What choice do I have? Don’t have the muscle of Ali.” Although Ali issued his famous declaration “I ain’t got no quarrel with them Vietcong” more than a year earlier, he did not officially refuse induction to the Army until April 28, 1967. He was sentenced on June 20, 1967 – about one month before the riot in Detroit. Even if Messer’s allusion could be considered anachronistic, since it wouldn’t have been clear in July 1967 that Ali would not go to prison and would have his sentence overturned in 1970, the reason for wanting to bring the famous fighter who refused to fight and emblem of black pride into her story is not to comprehend.

Using the novel’s 70th anniversary as an excuse for writing about it, I picked up Carson McCullers’s The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter, which contains a reference that might look even more anachronistic than Messer’s: “Karl Marx talked about Joe Louis.” I can’t say whether that would have struck readers as more or less odd in 1940, but since the Karl Marx in question is actually Dr. Copeland’s son and not his famous namesake, it does make a kind of sense. References to Louis (and there are more than one) certainly fit, since McCullers set the novel in 1938, the year of the boxer’s emphatic win over the German Max Schmeling. Copeland judges an essay contest for black high-school students, one of whom – no doubt taking inspiration from Louis – wishes to become a prizefighter.

Several recent books about jazz, read for projects both completed and in-progress, turn to the sport. In The Blue Moment, Richard Williams describes John Coltrane, after leaving Miles Davis’s group, extending his saxophone solos to thirty minutes and claims the drummer Elvin Jones “needed a boxer’s physique to keep pace with his leader.” Boxing figures both literally and metaphorically (if also only in passing) in Terry Teachout’s biography of Louis Armstrong. The trumpeter’s manager, Joe Glaser, was “a hot-tempered boxing promoter.” (Glaser also worked with boxer Sugar Ray Robinson, as I note in an essay on both Teachout’s Pops and Wil Haygood’s biography of Robinson, Sweet Thunder.) Teachout quotes Robert Goffin, a Belgian jazz critic and author of an early Armstrong biography, describing the musician’s first performance in England. In a less flattering fashion than when Williams likened Jones to a fit fighter, Goffin compared Armstrong to a hard-working athlete: “His face drips like a heavyweight’s, steam rises from his lips….” In Miles, Ornette, Cecil, Howard Mandel refers to Davis’s admiration for the “self-possessed, accomplished Robinson (something Haygood examines closely). He says that drummer Max Roach, by choosing to work with the relentless pianist Cecil Taylor, faced a challenge equivalent to “being in the ring with Joe Louis, Jack Johnson or Mike Tyson.

It comes as no surprise at all to find Ernest Hemingway mentioning boxing. In A Movable Feast, he uses boxing weight classes when discussing his own body. “When you are twenty-five and are a natural heavyweight, missing a meal makes you very hungry.” I could have put that in “Weight Loss: A Love Story” (an essay included in Fighters & Writers), where I quote New Yorker scribe A.J. Liebling using the divisions similarly. In his memoir, Hemingway also recounts trying to teach Ezra Pound how to box and enlist him in the ranks of fighting writers.

Cyril Connolly, who says T.S. Eliot also took boxing lessons, nearly used one of the poet’s lines – “time and the bell” – as title for an essay collection, but rejected it in favor of The Evening Colonnade when a friend said the other one unpleasantly reminded him of boxing.

Not all writerly uses of boxing are of championship caliber, of course. In his thriller Death of a Writer, Michael Collins concludes a conversation between a detective and a suspect with this: “A bell rang as if at the end of a round in a prizefight.” This feels unearned. It suggests a battle of wits between closely matched combatants, but Collins’s dialogue lacks such tension. In Autobiography of a Recovering Skinhead, Frank Meeink recounts physical abuse at the hand of a vicious stepfather, an ex-boxer. (I reviewed the book for The Oregonian.)

Even after all work on Fighters & Writers was completed, I continued to come across unanticipated pairing of literary types and pugilists. A Daily Beast article likened feuding writers to boxers. Christopher Hitchens repeatedly states in Hitch-22 that he never developed any interest in sports, but recalls a compulsory school boxing tournament in which, perhaps needless to say, he didn’t excel. He seems to have learned something from it, however, something that relates directly to his work as a writer. Painful moments at school left him “slightly better equipped” to confront greater one later in life. 

There’s no need to attached great significance to any of these coincidences, but all of them together left me pretty certain I was on to something.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 95 other followers

%d bloggers like this: